Yes, Janice, secular liberals in government seemed determined to stamp out the last vestiges of the religious bedrock on which our nation was founded. Without the church acting as the American social conscience, people would think they are “totally free” when indulging broadly in every type of immorality, seemingly without consequence. But in fact, they would become “slaves to sin” (Romans 6:16-20) and lose all true freedom. As in the ancient Greco-Roman world, our formerly self-sufficient, innovative people would allow themselves to become hedonistic wards-of-the-state, demanding merely “bread & circuses.” This would allow secularist rulers to consolidate & perpetuate their own power indefinitely by making people dependent on government for every need & desire.

Thanks Brian for your affirmation. Your creative “slippery slope” scenario could soon become reality for people who no longer learn about the Constitution in school, and who cannot distinguish between true needs and “frivolous wants.” (The Constitution severely limits even the “needs” government should meet). This ignorance coupled with the entitlement mentality of Fluke’s generation will bankrupt & weaken America very quickly unless we reverse current trends.

Rebelling against the Lord’s principles & demanding unlimited goodies? Yep, sounds like bratty, whiny babies to me. God forgive us, and help the U.S.A.

Good comment as always. I would like to add, in my opinion, that Obama’s objective in the Sandra Fluke matter, had not much to do with her, Sandra and et al’s licentious lifestyles and governments mandate to support it. But, it provided an opportunity once again, to tear down and chip away the objective truth found in the institution of the Catholic Church. He has systematically declared war on her – the church. This fact is evident. If he can silence the church and those who follow Christ’s teachings and dim the light of truth, then there is no stopping his diabolic intentions (even though he believes they are good). And I am afraid to say even at the expense of sacrificing of his two daughters.

Women must be very careful how they dress. Tight, form fitting clothing, short skirts, see through clothing, cleavage exposure are simply advertising her sensuality to all men. Men are visual. Many times that which is unseen is much more attractive then that which is given away, freely.

OMD – Thanks for the apropos quote from the “rough rider” himself! Writing a “politically incorrect book” is indeed a rough ride, but infinitely more satisfying than a “safe, gentle walk on a smooth, level path”.

Holly – You wrote: “It matters not the “market”, the reception, or the journey there…. the outcome is obedience to the task given (to me).” Yes, one of the themes throughout my book is that God calls us to be faithful, not successful. He rewards our obedience and is alone responsible for the impact of the book. He certainly defines “success” differently than we sinners do. Even though I tell others these things I still need to hear them stated back to me once in a while . . . uh, okay, FREQUENTLY! Thanks for your willingness to keep reminding me

Tanja – Thanks for Colossians 3:23 ” . . . work at it with all our heart, as working for the Lord, not for men.” . . . one of my favorite Scriptures! Bob & I are entering a season in which I should be able to devote more of my heart to the book and less to employment for paying the bills. Keep your proofreading skills sharpened; I’ll be sending you a new chapter draft soon.

Kim – You wrote: “All these steps are also reminiscent of pregnancy and childbirth.”
Yes, prior to reading the Churchill metaphors I had heard other authors compare book-writing to pregnancy & birth . . . after naturally delivering 3 daughters I can relate!

God bless you all!